Legal Opinion
Keith Huckaby v. CRST Expedited, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 1, 2025No. 2:21-cv-07766Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 KEITH HUCKABY, Case № 2:21-cv-07766-ODW (PDx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR 13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [108][109]; AND DENYING MOTION FOR 14 CRST EXPEDITED, INC. et al., DECERTIFICATION [115] 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Keith Huckaby is a former long-haul truck driver for Defendants 19 CRST Expedited, Inc. and CRST International, Inc. (together, “CRST”). (First Am. 20 Compl. (“FAC”) ¶¶ 6, 11–12, ECF No. 44.) Huckaby contends that CRST’s 21 compensation model does not comply with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.