Legal Opinion

Claxton v. Waters

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2004No. S106106Published

1Opinion of the Court

18 Cal.Rptr.3d 246 (2004)

34 Cal.4th 367

96 P.3d 496

Carolyn CLAXTON, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Ray WATERS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S106106.

Supreme Court of California.

August 30, 2004.

As Modified September 15, 2004.

Law Offices of Joseph R. Zamora and Joseph R. Zamora, Santa Monica, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, David A. Cathcart, Paul DeCamp, Washington, DC, Michele L. Maryottt, Irvine and Jeffrey F. Webb, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.

KENNARD, J.

In executing the standard preprinted form used to settle workers' compensation claims, does an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API