Legal Opinion

Wiker v. Wiker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1978No. 15326PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to award support money for Roger, child of the parties, after he had attained the age of eighteen years. The thrust of Mrs. Wiker’s claim is that a divorce decree awarding a monthly amount to support Roger until he attained his majority, was entered at a time prior to May 27, 1975, when Sec. 15-2-1, Utah Code Annotated read as follows:

15-2-1. Period of minority. — The period of minority extends in males to the age of twenty-one years and in females to that of eighteen years ; but all minors obtain their majority by marriage. [Emphasis added.]

She…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. HooverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Jungjohann v. JungjohannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McBroom v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. McBroom v. Shauna Child SchmunkUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In re Estate of RC WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In re Estate of RC WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API