Wiker v. Wiker
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to award support money for Roger, child of the parties, after he had attained the age of eighteen years. The thrust of Mrs. Wiker’s claim is that a divorce decree awarding a monthly amount to support Roger until he attained his majority, was entered at a time prior to May 27, 1975, when Sec. 15-2-1, Utah Code Annotated read as follows:
15-2-1. Period of minority. — The period of minority extends in males to the age of twenty-one years and in females to that of eighteen years ; but all minors obtain their majority by marriage. [Emphasis added.]
She…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. HooverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Jungjohann v. JungjohannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McBroom v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- McBroom v. Shauna Child SchmunkUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Estate of RC WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Estate of RC WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 2016