Legal Opinion

Jungjohann v. Jungjohann

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1973No. 46,979PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This appeal is taken from an order of the trial court terminating the obligation of appellee, Kenneth R. Jungjohann, to pay child support for his daughter, Elizabeth Jungjohann. The trial court’s order was based upon K. S. A. 1972 Supp. 38-101 which became effective July 1,1972, and reads:

“The period of minority extends in males and females to the age of eighteen (18) years.”

The forerunner statute provided that the age of minority extended to the age of twenty-one with a proviso' pertaining to ‘legally married persons over eighteen years of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Shoaf v. ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Fellows v. FellowsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Sweeney v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sillman v. SillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Schmitz v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Davenport v. DavenportCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API