Legal Opinion

Cargar v. Fee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1889No. 13,767PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, C. J. —

The judge of the Wells Circuit Court entered of record the appointment of James P. Hale, Esq., as judge pro tempore, and Mr. Hale accepted the appoint*537ment and qualified. The appellant, by affidavit, objected to the competency of Mr. Hale, whereupon he appointed Edwin C. Vaughan judge pro tempore, and Mr. Vaughan duly •qualified. As soon as Mr. Vaughan had qualified, the appellant objected to his trying the cause, and in support of his objection asserted that the appointment was unauthorized, and that Mr. Vaughan was incompetent because he held the office of prosecuting…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Brown v. BuzanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Feaster v. WoodfillIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Bartley v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lillie v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Cougill v. SachsWashington Supreme Court · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API