Legal Opinion

United States v. Schuemann

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 23, 1954No. Crim. A. No. 94-52PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOHOE, Chief Judge.

Defendant, George Stanley Sehuemann, was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury in this district for violation of the Universal Military Training and ■Service Act, § 12, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, *641§ 462. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty and waived his right to trial by jury in the manner prescribed in Fed. Rules Crim.Proc. Rule 23(a), 18 U.S.C.A. Upon careful consideration of the admissible evidence produced at defendant’s trial, the court makes the general finding that the defendant is guilty as charged.

In the absence of a request, special findings of fact are not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Neal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Paul John Matyastik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Ross Cabell HillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  4. United States v. BartellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. United States v. KinneyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API