Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Waller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 16, 1977No. 1 CA-CIV 3370PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHROEDER, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action. The main contention on appeal is that the defense was entitled to a directed verdict because there was no evidence from which the jury properly could find that the defendant had breached the standard of care owed by a general practitioner. We hold there was sufficient evidence.

The case arises out of an injury sustained by plaintiff, Richard Waller, while he was operating a high pressure paint spraygun. The hose of the spraygun broke and he was struck by the paint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Evans v. BernhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Frederick Et Ux. v. Yellow Cab Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Decker v. RamenofskyArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. United States v. T. D. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Wendling v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Roberts v. Morgensen MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Boatman v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API