Erickson v. Waller
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action. The main contention on appeal is that the defense was entitled to a directed verdict because there was no evidence from which the jury properly could find that the defendant had breached the standard of care owed by a general practitioner. We hold there was sufficient evidence.
The case arises out of an injury sustained by plaintiff, Richard Waller, while he was operating a high pressure paint spraygun. The hose of the spraygun broke and he was struck by the paint…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Evans v. BernhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Frederick Et Ux. v. Yellow Cab Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Decker v. RamenofskyArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. T. D. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Wendling v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Roberts v. Morgensen MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Boatman v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.