Legal Opinion
People v. Ten $500 Barclays Bank Visa Traveler's Checks
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 1993No. A057910PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STRANKMAN, P. J.
This case concerns the application of Health and Safety Code section 11488.4, subdivision (a), which provides in pertinent part that a complaint for forfeiture of the alleged proceeds of drug trafficking must be filed “within one year of the seizure of the property which is subject to forfeiture . . . .” The trial court concluded that a forfeiture complaint was barred by this statute of limitations and sustained a claimant’s demurrer without leave to amend. The People appeal. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
Claimant and real party in interest Spirit Acacia…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Hinman v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. One 1937 Lincoln Zephyr SedanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Department of Social Welfare of State of California v. StaufferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. Property Listed in Exhibit OneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cuevas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. ShanndoahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Cuevas v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. 6344 Skyway, ParadiseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999