Legal Opinion
Hanes v. Giambrone
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1984No. 8379PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrogan, P. J.
On October 26,1979, appellee, Russell Hanes, and Cheryl Medley, Mary Jo Hayes, and appellant, Letitia Giambrone, entered into a partnership agreement. The partnership was called “Paragon II Office Company.” The purpose of the partnership was to acquire a certain parcel of real estate located in Centerville, Ohio, and to construct an office building thereon. Paragraph five of the partnership agreement provided that capital of the partnership shall be contributed as follows:
Letitia Giambrone $19,875
Cheryl Medley $39,750
Mary Jo Hayes $19,875
Russell Hanes $19,875
Paragraph five further provided…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New York Life Insurance Co. v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Perlberg v. PerlbergOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Oteri v. ScalzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lake Hiawatha Park Ass'n v. Knox County Agricultural SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
- McGrath v. CowenOhio Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ohio University Board of Trustees v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Notch View Associates v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- DiPasquale v. CostasOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dunn v. ZimmermanOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. MDL Active Duration Fund, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.