Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Thomas

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 13, 1981No. CM 439192Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJones, Senior Judge

I agree with Judge Garn that appellant’s conviction of heroin use must be reversed but I disagree that the possession charge can be affirmed.

The agents found heroin in appellant’s sewing kit during a search of his person incident to apprehension. The apprehension in turn was based on several factors which the military judge at trial and the majority here determined amounted to probable cause. Among those factors was the response by appellant to an inquiry which was made in violation of Article 31(b). Absent appellant’s response that he had in fact been to Frankfurt and had been “partying”, I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CollierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. HaynesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. GeorgeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API