United States v. Dunn
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*389Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
A general court-martial convicted the accused of three specifications of larceny of Army and Air Force Exchange Service property. The first issue presented for our consideration concerns the sentence.
When the court-martial returned from its deliberation on the sentence, the law officer asked if it had arrived at a sentence. Receiving an affirmative reply, he asked for, and obtained from the president, a handwritten statement. He read it, and as a result of “certain ambiguities” he thought he found in it, he instructed the court on “hard labor”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PridgeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Harlan v. McGourinSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. LinderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. HowesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. AloyianUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. CashUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. PhillipsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. HollisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.