Legal Opinion
Lemelson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 26, 1983No. Nos. 414-79C, 415-79CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
SETO, Judge:
Plaintiff, Jerome H. Lemelson, alleges that he is entitled to recover, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, reasonable and entire compensation for the unauthorized use by or for the United States Government of the inventions claimed in three of his U.S. patents. At the completion of the 26-day presentation of plaintiff’s case-in-chief, defendant and both third-party defendants jointly moved for dismissal of these actions for plaintiff’s failure to adduce a prima facie case of patent infringement.1
The only issues sub judice on defendants’ motion to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Leesona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Decca Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jerome H. Lemelson v. The United States, the Bendix Corporation and Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Lemelson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Intertech Licensing Corp. v. Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Lemelson v. Bendix Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984