Legal Opinion

Leesona Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 16, 1979No. 130-70PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge

In Leesona Corp. v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 871, 530 F.2d 896 (1976), this court held that certain claims of three patents owned by plaintiff Leesona were valid and infringed by the defendant United States. The issue in this case is the determination of "reasonable and entire” compensation due plaintiff for that infringement under 28 U.S.C. § 1498, i.e., what is called in these cases the "accounting phase.” Trial Judge Browne, to whom this phase was assigned under our Rule 131(c), determined that Leesona was entitled to judgment in the amount of $3,534,753.52, which included attorneys’…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Railroad Dynamics, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. A. Stucki Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. Alden W. Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API