Legal Opinion

Kinsman Transit Co. v. Dunham Towing & Wrecking Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 9, 1953No. 3536PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREED, District Judge.

I am unable to agree with the conclusion reached in Puget Sound Tug and Barge Co. v. The Go-Getter, D.C. 1952, 106 F.Supp. 492. It is unnecessary to belabor the construction of the phrase in question or to engage in a lengthy discussion of semantics. It is sufficient to say that the words “any civil action”, as used in 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a), are broad enough, in my view, to embrace actions in Admiralty. Paco Tankers, Inc. v. Atlantic Land & Improvement Co., D.C. 1952, 108 F.Supp. 406; Le Mee v. Strackfus Steamers, D.C. 1951, 96 F.Supp. 270; Crawford v. Ann Arbor R. Co.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Nicol v. Koscinski, U.S. Dist. JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. American Mail Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  4. Le Mee v. Streckfus Steamers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1951
  5. Crawford v. Ann Arbor R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hercules Company v. S/S AramisDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1964
  2. Coleman v. Stockard Steamship Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Meagher v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API