Grover v. Merritt Development Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CANT, District Judge.
In the exercise of its general equity powers, this court, on August 30, 1921, appointed a receiver for the defendant, a Minnesota corporation. Such appointment was upon the express consent of the defendant. The regularity and Validity thereof is unquestioned. At the time of such appointment, the apparent assets of the defendant were considerable and the fixed liabilities were large in amount. Since such appointment, practically all of those assets have been converted into cash. The actual value proved to be mueh less than was anticipated. There is practically nothing…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- California Prune & Apricot Growers' Ass'n v. Catz American Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Hibel Fur Co. v. StronginCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
- Town of Fairfax ex rel. Barringer v. HublerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938
- Park v. ParkDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1941
- Kuzminski v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.