Legal Opinion

Town of Fairfax ex rel. Barringer v. Hubler

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1938No. 1205PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

This suit was instituted by certain individual holders of special improvement bonds, in the name of the Town of Fair-fax, Oklahoma, a municipal corporation, ex rel. Brandon Barringer, H. N. Perkins, and William W. Allen, Jr., to foreclose bonds in paving district No. 1 in the Town of Fairfax, pursuant to statutory authority therefor. Some one hundred forty persons are joined as defendants in the fifty-eight separate causes of action set forth in plaintiffs’ bill. Each separate cause of action is directed against one or more separate defendants and involves…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Chicot County v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Ogden City v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Walter v. Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. Michael B. GammonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Dwyer v. Le Flore CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. City of Hollis ex rel. Kearn v. CarrellDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API