Legal Opinion

Hibel Fur Co. v. Strongin

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 31, 1929No. 2340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court, adjudging the appellant, the Hibel Fur Company, a bankrupt.

July 31, 1928, Sidney F. Strongin filed an involuntary petition in bankruptcy against the Hibel Fur Company, setting out that he was the receiver of the Great Northern Dyeing & Dressing Corporation, a New York corporation, by appointment of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of New York in an equity proceeding; that the Hibel Fur Company, a Massachusetts corporation, for the greater portion of six months next preceding the date of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canute Steamship Co. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. In re Diamond Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. In re HarrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  4. Grover v. Merritt Development Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pianta v. H. M. Reich Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. Guterman v. C. D. Parker & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
  3. Harney Shoes, Inc. v. National Fabric & Finishing Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  4. In Re LaRocheDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
  5. Guterman v. C. D. Parker & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API