Legal Opinion

State v. Uhlig

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 2, 2007No. 96,663PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

Christopher L. Uhlig was convicted of possessing methylenedioxymethamphetamine, a drug commonly known as ecstasy. The ecstasy was found by a court services officer when she searched his bedroom. Uhlig unsuccessfully sought to suppress the drug evidence and now asks us to overturn his conviction because of this warrantless search. But probationers do not enjoy the absolute liberty to which every citizen is entitled. For example, one condition of Uhlig’s juvenile probation required him to submit to searches “at home, school, work or elsewhere” as directed by his court services officer.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. HaffnerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  3. State v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. ToliverCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API