State v. Uhlig
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
Christopher L. Uhlig was convicted of possessing methylenedioxymethamphetamine, a drug commonly known as ecstasy. The ecstasy was found by a court services officer when she searched his bedroom. Uhlig unsuccessfully sought to suppress the drug evidence and now asks us to overturn his conviction because of this warrantless search. But probationers do not enjoy the absolute liberty to which every citizen is entitled. For example, one condition of Uhlig’s juvenile probation required him to submit to searches “at home, school, work or elsewhere” as directed by his court services officer.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. HaffnerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- State v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- State v. ToliverCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.