Legal Opinion

United States v. Smiti Liberse

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 30, 2012No. 12-10243PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

CARNES, Circuit Judge:

This is the third decision we have issued in the past month concerning the application of Amendments 750 and 759 to the sentencing guidelines and the scope of a district court’s authority to reduce a defendant’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). In the first two decisions, we held that those amendments did not authorize a court to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) if the defendant’s guidelines range remained the statutory mandatory minimum after the amendments or if the guidelines range was otherwise not affected by the amendments. See United States v. Glover,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. BravoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Deshawn Travis GloverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Christina Elizabeth ColonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Jerry Jerome AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Adolfo WrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Damon JoinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API