Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Marubeni Cotton Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1975No. 74-1972PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, Senior District Judge.

Appellant appeals from a contempt order issued by the district court requiring him to pay to the appellees certain costs and attorneys fees claimed for enforcing appellant’s compliance with a subpoena duces tecum. We reverse and remand for the reasons stated.

The issues presented in this appeal are:

1) Whether the district court has the authority under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in its enforcement of a duly issued and served subpoena duces tecum to tax costs and attorneys fees against a non-party.

2) Whether the appellant was deprived of a reasonable…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Badman v. StarkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Daval Steel Products v. M/V FakredineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API