Legal Opinion

Cookeville Gynecology & Obstetrics, P.C. v. Southeastern Data Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 11, 1994PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*459LEWIS, Judge.

OPINION

Plaintiff Cookeville Gynecology & Obstetrics, P.C. (Cookeville, P.C.), purchased a computer system from defendant Southeast em Data Systems, Inc. (SDS). Cookeville, P.C. contends it had a “satisfaction guaranteed, money back” contract with SDS. SDS insists that the guarantee of Cookeville, P.C. was that Cookeville, P.C. would be offered a full refund if the computer system did not perform as stated in the proposals of SDS after the Implementation Plan was completed.

The Chancellor, following a bench trial, found the letter agreement of 9 October, 1990 “vague and ambiguous”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bob Pearsall Motors, Inc. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Farmers-Peoples Bank v. ClemmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Earle v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Edwards v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Oman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Barnes & Robinson Co. v. OneSource Facility Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. International Flight Center v. City of MurfreesboroCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. Dog House Investments, LLC v. Teal Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  5. Julia Fisher v. Ashley RevellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API