Legal Opinion
Washington v. Brantley
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided December 12, 1972No. 72-2-Civ-OcPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF COURT
SCOTT, District Judge.
In this case the plaintiff has sued in the amended complaint three defendants: a person, a municipality and an insurer and has prayed solely for damages. Thus, upon the filing by defendants City of Dunnellon, the municipality, and The Travelers Insurance Company, the insurer, of their respective motions to dismiss, the question of whether the City of Dunnellon is a proper party defendant was brought into sharp focus.
The plaintiff has sued Brantley, the individual, for acts which he allegedly unlawfully committed in the course and scope of his duties as a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Berlin Democratic Club v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Greenya v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Jacobson v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
- 6th Camden Corp. v. Evesham Tp., Burlington Cty.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.