Bingler v. Hopper
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
There are three appeals; the plaintiff’s is from the award of a new trial. Defendants, by separate appeals, complain of the refusal of their motions for judgment n. o. v.
The defendant, Hopper, was a truck driver employed by the defendant, Uhrik. Hopper’s wife was killed while accompanying him on Uhrik’s truck. She had a son, David, at the time she married Hopper, and, on that surviving son’s behalf, this suit was brought to' recover for her death which, it was alleged, resulted from defendants’ negligence. The suit was brought in the name of the minor by his next…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Minkin v. MinkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Casey v. SicilianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gunn v. RollingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Mervine v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Schranner v. Wheeling Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Vear Anne Schranner, Administratrix of the Estate of William Schranner, Jr., Deceased v. Wheeling Steel Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Carol Sarver, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Sarver, Deceased. Vera Anne Schranner, Administratrix of the Estate of William S. Schranner, Deceased v. Wheeling Steel Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Carol Sarver, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Sarver, Deceased. Carol Sarver, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Sarver, Deceased v. Wheeling Steel Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Vera Anne Schranner, Administratrix of the Estate of William Schranner, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968