Legal Opinion
Gunn v. Rollings
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 24, 1967No. 18715PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moss, Chief Justice.
These two actions were instituted in behalf of Donnie Gunn and Eddie Dale Gunn, minors, by a guardian ad litem to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while riding as passengers in an automobile operated by Eufaula Rollings.
It is alleged that the injuries to the said minors were the result of the negligent, careless, reckless and willful acts of Eufaula Rollings in the operation of an automobile on March 27, 1965, in York County, South Carolina. It appears that Rollings lost his life in the collision and these actions are against the administrator of his estate.
T…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cannon v. CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Trudell v. LeatherbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Reingold v. ReingoldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Rutkowski v. WaskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Lasecki v. KabaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ard v. ArdSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Hyder v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Campbell v. GruttemeyerTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Warren v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Zellmer v. ZellmerWashington Supreme Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.