Legal Opinion

Strogoff v. Motor Sales Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 1939PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff was injured in this Commonwealth by reason of the operation by one Hodgman of an automobile owned by the defendant. The defendant was a dealer in motor vehicles in Hartford, Connecticut. The plaintiff’s case now rests upon his contention that the defendant’s automobile was a “trespasser” upon the highway and a nuisance.

The evidence, briefly summarized, was this: Hodgman was the defendant’s office manager. The defendant lent the automobile to Hodgman for Hodgman’s personal use during Hodgman’s vacation. The automobile bore “Con*346necticut dealer’s registration plates” which had been…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Commonwealth v. MacloonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Cohen v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Leone v. DoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. National Fruit Product Co. v. Dwinell-Wright Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
  5. Gordon v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API