Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cordle

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 26, 1989PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The defendant, Melissa Jo Cordle, appeals from her convictions for the murders in the first degree of Ralph Anderson and Frances Schiappa, and from her conviction for *734burglary. The defendant argues that the judge should have allowed her motions for required findings of not guilty. She also argues that, even if the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdicts, the judge erred in failing to instruct the jurors that mere presence at the scene was insufficient to establish guilt and that a new trial therefore is required. We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. ChalifouxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. GallisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. MerolaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. CordleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. CoonanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. MontaninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API