Langevin v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Jerry W. Langevin appeals his conviction for driving under the influence. This appeal presents three questions concerning the corpus delicti rule-the doctrine that a criminal conviction can not rest solely on the defendant's confession.
The first question is an issue of law: whether, under Alaska law, the trial judge or the jury is the one who decides whether the government's evidence satisfies the corpus delicti rule. The second question is case-specific: whether, given the evidence presented at Langevin's trial, the State satisfied the corpus delicti requirement. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Armstrong v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCord v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
- Leggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2014
- State v. Cardenas-FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. LeniartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019