Legal Opinion

Langevin v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided June 3, 2011No. A-10510PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Jerry W. Langevin appeals his conviction for driving under the influence. This appeal presents three questions concerning the corpus delicti rule-the doctrine that a criminal conviction can not rest solely on the defendant's confession.

The first question is an issue of law: whether, under Alaska law, the trial judge or the jury is the one who decides whether the government's evidence satisfies the corpus delicti rule. The second question is case-specific: whether, given the evidence presented at Langevin's trial, the State satisfied the corpus delicti requirement. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Armstrong v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCord v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
  2. Leggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2014
  3. State v. Cardenas-FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. LeniartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API