United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance

The plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment rendered for the defendant. Its sole claim of error is that the trial court erred in holding that the plaintiff was required to allege a contractual relation*126ship with the defendant as a prerequisite to recovery under the equitable doctrine of unjust enrichment. We find no error.

The following facts are not in dispute. An automobile owned by the plaintiff’s insured was involved in an accident with a vehicle owned by the defendant’s insured, causing injuries to the driver and passenger of the plaintiff’s insured’s car. The defendant denied coverage…