Legal Opinion

Christie v. Powell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1972No. 7214SC358PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

First, plaintiffs assign as error that the trial court ruled as a matter of law that defendant was under no duty to reveal such knowledge as he did have to the plaintiffs, and had no knowledge of sufficient circumstances to put him on notice of the existence of a potentially dangerous condition in the foundation wall.

The plaintiffs’ assignments of error nos. 2 and 3 are based on the following finding by the trial judge:

“The burden of proof being on the Plaintiffs, the Court is not satisfied by the greater weight of the evidence either that a condition existed in respect to the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. Durham Mental Health/Development Disabilities/Substance Abuse Area AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Forrest v. Pitt County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Bethea v. BetheaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Matter of ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Fellows v. FellowsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API