Legal Opinion

Durback v. Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 5, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 N.J. Super. 160 (1951)

85 A.2d 315

MOLLY DURBACK, PLAINTIFF,

v.

FIDELITY & GUARANTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.

Decided December 5, 1951.

Mr. Herbert J. Kenarik, attorney for the plaintiff.

Mr. William P. Braun, attorney for the defendant.

CONLON, J.C.C.

This is an action on an insurance policy and is submitted upon an agreed stipulation of facts which may be summarized as follows:

On August 4, 1950, defendant issued an "Automobile Physical Damage Policy" to the plaintiff Molly Durback and one James Feeney, the latter…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chase Manhattan Bank v. BurdenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Parker v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. William Talasek v. The Travelers Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Young-Peterson Construction, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. The Potomac Insurance Company of the District of Columbia, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API