Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Burden
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1985No. 83-669PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), filed this action against Peter A. Williams and I. Townsend Burden, III, the only partners in a limited partnership, for $15,000 plus punitive damages. The complaint alleged that Burden had received money from Chase to which he was not entitled. After hearing argument on Chase’s and Burden’s cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted Burden’s motion. 1 We affirm.
I
Burden was the limited partner and Williams the general partner in the partnership, which was established under the laws of the state of New York. The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Sturdivant v. Seaboard Service System, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Blanken v. HARRIS, UPHAM & CO., INCORPORATEDDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Michele Hall v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Flocco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Chambers v. Nasa Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.