Legal Opinion

People v. Merfeld

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1997No. A075759PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, J. *

This case presents an issue of first impression—whether the privilege against self-incrimination bars the prosecution from questioning an alleged mentally disordered offender (MDO) about his mental state at a Penal Code 1 section 2972 hearing. 2 We conclude that it does not.

I. Facts

A. Procedural Background

Bernard Merfeld (appellant) was convicted of felony battery with serious injury (§ 243, subd. (d)). The trial court sentenced him to the time he had already served and granted him probation. He violated his probation eight months later by committing another battery, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cramer v. TyarsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. Superior Court (Myers)California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. PretzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API