Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 2000No. E025550PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, Acting P. J.

Defendant, adjudged a mentally disordered offender (an MDO) required to undergo mental health treatment as a condition of parole, contends that (1) she should not have been forced to testify about her mental state and behavior when committing the underlying offense on which her parole was based, and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support findings that (a) she used force or violence in the underlying offense, and (b) her severe mental condition was a cause of or an aggravating factor in that offense.1

Facts and Procedural History

The People charged defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. HubbartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. People v. Anthony C.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API