Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 1986No. 80074, 80075A; CA A40797, A40839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In a trial to the court, defendant was convicted of reckless driving, a Class A misdemeanor, and the lesser included offense of careless driving, a Class B traffic infraction. On appeal, the state concedes that defendant is entitled to a reversal of both convictions.

Regarding the reckless driving conviction, the state acknowledges that no formal, written waiver of defendant’s right to a jury trial, signed by him, appears in the trial court file, as required by Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and ORS 136.001. Regarding the careless driving conviction, the court erred in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CullettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API