Legal Opinion

State v. Cullett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1987No. J84-0971; CA A40881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for theft in the first degree, contending that he- was tried without a jury and that there is neither a written waiver of his right to a jury trial, ORS 136.001, nor a recorded oral waiver of a jury trial.

The state concedes that there is no written waiver in the trial court file and that there is no record of an oral waiver in the transcription by the court reporter. Accordingly, defendant is entitled to a new trial. State v. Rogers, 83 Or App 270, 730 P2d 43 (1986); State v. Naughten, 5 Or App 6, 480 P2d 448, rev den (1971).

Reversed and remanded for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. NaughtenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. ProvorseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API