Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 6, 1987No. 80074, 80075A; CA A40797, A40839Published

1Per curiam

We grant the state’s motion for reconsideration of our opinion, 83 Or App 270, 730 P2d 43 (1986), for the limited purpose of modifying the disposition of the appeal in one particular. Because defendant was charged separately with careless driving, we suspend execution of the sentence of his conviction for that charge, pending further proceedings in the trial court. In the event defendant is retried and convicted of reckless driving, the state concedes that the careless driving conviction must then be vacated. If defendant is not convicted on the reckless driving charge, his sentence for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API