Woods v. Rosefay Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction to restrain defendants from violating the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., and Regulations promulgated thereunder during the pendency of this action.
From affidavits filed on behalf of plaintiff and defendants it appears that:
Mabel Baldwin and her husband, Albert H. Baldwin, are the tenants of a 19-room building at 1143 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey. Of the nineteen rooms, they occupy two rooms, renting the other 17 as sleeping rooms.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 112 East 36th Street Holding Corp. v. DaffosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Lovett v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bonanno v. BolloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1946
- Ridolfi v. BentonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- United States Trust Co. v. SchaefferAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grosz v. ConserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951