Legal Opinion

Woods v. Rosefay Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 8, 1948No. Civil Action No. 11260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction to restrain defendants from violating the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., and Regulations promulgated thereunder during the pendency of this action.

From affidavits filed on behalf of plaintiff and defendants it appears that:

Mabel Baldwin and her husband, Albert H. Baldwin, are the tenants of a 19-room building at 1143 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey. Of the nineteen rooms, they occupy two rooms, renting the other 17 as sleeping rooms.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. 112 East 36th Street Holding Corp. v. DaffosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Lovett v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bonanno v. BolloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1946
  4. Ridolfi v. BentonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. United States Trust Co. v. SchaefferAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grosz v. ConserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API