State v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
On appeal from the district court’s denial of appellants’ motion to reinstate and discharge a bail bond, appellants argue that the bail bond was an unenforceable contract because of a mutual mistake of fact regarding the defendant’s identity. Alternatively, appellants contend that they were entitled to reinstatement and discharge of the bond. We disagree with both arguments, and affirm.
FACTS
On April 13, 2008, police arrested an individual who identified himself as “Johnny Ray Rodriguez.” A complaint was filed against “Johnny Ray Rodriguez,” but on April 14, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- La Grotta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paradise v. Eagle Creek Software Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Alberto Villa-Barrera, Ability Bonding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jose C. Garcia Delaharran, Griffin Bail Bonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015