Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 2009No. A09-395PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

On appeal from the district court’s denial of appellants’ motion to reinstate and discharge a bail bond, appellants argue that the bail bond was an unenforceable contract because of a mutual mistake of fact regarding the defendant’s identity. Alternatively, appellants contend that they were entitled to reinstatement and discharge of the bond. We disagree with both arguments, and affirm.

FACTS

On April 13, 2008, police arrested an individual who identified himself as “Johnny Ray Rodriguez.” A complaint was filed against “Johnny Ray Rodriguez,” but on April 14, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. La Grotta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paradise v. Eagle Creek Software Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  2. State of Minnesota v. Alberto Villa-Barrera, Ability Bonding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State of Minnesota v. Jose C. Garcia Delaharran, Griffin Bail Bonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API