Legal Opinion

Meade County Bank v. Decker

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

..Appeal from .circuit court, .-Meade county;-Hon-.r:W., Cb Rice, Judge.- ." ,. ■ ■Action by the Meade County Bank- against.. Revi Decker; From a judgment'for plaintiff, defendant appeals. -

1Opinion of the Court

.Co.rson, P. J.

This case comes, before us on-a motion-Jo dismiss the appeal, on the ground that-it Is-.“an-appeal. aR tempted to be taken, from two separate and, distinct'appeal able orders made by the Eighth Judicial "Circuit- "Cd'urt-. within.iand for. the-county, of-.Meade, -one of 'which < was entered up.pn-the 1st day of May,- and the other, on the 9th-day of' Jfing, ..lkOJA The action .was brought by the.plaintiff against the defendant to .foreclose a chattel mortgage-. -Judgment, was ' entered against the defendant by'defaulb, and a Motion was'thereupon made by him to vacate and set…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HubbardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Granger v. RollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Anderson v. HultmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hackett v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Parmalee v. WheelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grieves v. DanaherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Meade County Bank of Sturgis v. DeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bronson v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API