State v. Keller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.
The defendant offered no evidence. Defendant Keller assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence.
The evidence for the State considered in its most favorable light and giving to the State every reasonable intendment thereon and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom (S. v. Roux, 266 N.C. 555, 146 S.E. 2d 654), shows the following: “Claude Woodie is president of B & W Plomes, Inc., a manufacturer of mobile homes. He uses in his business checks imprinted with the name of B & W Homes, Inc. About a year ago the office…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. RouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. TaftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.