David McDonough, Inc. v. Berger
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSidney A. Fine, J.
This is a motion to strike out, as insufficient, the defenses pleaded in the answers of the defendants. The motion searches the record and, therefore, requires eon*647sider&tion of the sufficiency of the three causes of action alleged in the complaint.
Certain of the defendants’ criticisms of the complaint apply to all the causes of action. The failure to allege the issuance of execution against the corporate judgment debtor and its return unsatisfied is sufficiently excused by the allegation that execution was and is stayed by an order of the Federal court, pursuant to chapter 11 of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caesar v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- McKnight v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Firestone Tire Rubber Co. v. . AgnewNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Bottlers Seal Co. v. RaineyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mobinco Brokerage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Geltzer v. Mooney (In Re MacMenamin's Grill Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Crete Concrete Corp. v. JosephsNew York Supreme Court · 1971