Legal Opinion
Matter of Putnam v. Marshall
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Ch. J.
The petitioners are “ custodian-engineers ” of schools in the city of New York and are in the competitive class of the civil service. Compensation to custodian-engineers of schools in New York city is, with few exceptions, fixed or measured upon what is known as the indirect system. The salary of a custodian-engineer is intended to include not only compensation for the services rendered by him but also the compensation or wages of helpers who are not taken from competitive civil service lists but who are selected and employed by him, subject to the approval of the Board of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Harman v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Cottrell v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Nelson v. The Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Harman v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Mark v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. OF CITY OF NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.