Legal Opinion
Cottrell v. Board of Education
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1943PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.
This is a motion to strike out each of seven defenses interposed by the defendants and for judgment on the pleadings. The action has been brought by the plaintiff, a junior high school teacher, on behalf of himself and all other appointees- of the defendant Board of Education similarly situated, for a judgment declaring illegal and void, under section 889 of the Education Law, the acts of that defendant in first reducing and ultimately eliminating the salary increment credit which it was required to grant to its appointees for their prior *647service, in schools other than the New York City…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Connor v. EmersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Matter of O'Connor v. . EmersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Nelson v. The Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Nelson v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Frankle v. Board of Educ., City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mtr. Lezette v. Bd. of Educ., HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Berthiaume v. SCHOOL COM. OF CITY OF WOONSOCKETSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Gimprich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Harman v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Cottrell v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.