Legal Opinion
United States v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 24, 2011No. 09-1630PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Robert Jackson pled guilty to bank robbery pursuant to a plea agreement. Before his proffer interview, the government promised, “No statements made or other information provided by your client during such proffer and discussion will be used directly against your client in any criminal case.” Jackson’s presentence report (“PSR”), however, later contained several of his proffer statements. These were initially used in calculating his guideline sentence range, and the court relied on them in determining his specific sentence. Jackson now challenges both his guideline…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Harold G. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Samuel ChoiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John F. RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Mark Wayne Abanatha, United States of America v. Katherine Dawn Newsome AbanathaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Rodney HenryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Charles SandsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. William BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Ronnie DukeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.