United States ex rel. Rohrlich v. Fay

WEINFELD, District Judge.

This application by a state prisoner presents issues unlike those raised in a previous petition to this Court and with respect to which he has now exhausted all available state remedies.1 Accordingly, it is properly before this Court. Petitioner, however, is not entitled to a Federal writ of habeas corpus upon his claim that he was denied due process of law upon allegations that at trial the prosecution misrepresented the backgrounds of two key witnesses by misstating and concealing the facts and by failing to correct “false” testimony. A careful reading of the trial…