Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Huck

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1975No. 11654PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

This dispute arises out of an oral agreement to purchase farm machinery. On or about January 1, 1961, Sam Huck, defendant-appellant (hereinafter appellant) entered into an oral agreement to purchase from his landlord, Earl Barnes, plaintiff-respondent (hereinafter respondent) farm machinery which respondent owned for the sum of $8,255.00. Appellant also agreed at that time to reimburse respondent $350.00 for his share of the fertilizer previously applied to land he was leasing from respondent. The parties further agreed that appellant would pay respondent the principal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eagle Rock Corp. v. Idamont Hotel Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Thompson v. FairchildIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bjornstad v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Curzon v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Black Canyon Racquetball Club, Inc. v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. General Auto Parts Co. v. Genuine Parts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Gulf Chemical Employees Federal Credit Union v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Howes v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API