Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Fairchild

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1970No. 10432PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

On July 6, 1966, pursuant to a written contract, 160 acres of land was sold by Ward and Marie Fairchild (defendants-respondents) to Elizabeth A. Thompson (plaintiff-appellant). Prior to July, 1966 (the date of the written contract), Elizabeth A. Thompson and her husband, Robert, were living on the property in question under an oral agreement entered into in July, 1961. According to the terms of the oral agreement a payment of $850.00 per year was to be made by the Thompsons to the Fairchilds. In addition, the Thompsons were responsible for taxes.

The written sales contract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riley v. LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Stockmen's Supply Co. v. JenneIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Williamson v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Scogings v. LoveIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Speer v. QuinlanIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Robinson v. Williamsen Idaho Equipment CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bank of Idaho v. ColleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API