Legal Opinion

State v. Kramer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 7, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On quo warranto on demurrer to information.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

By an information in the nature of quo warranto, filed March 16th, 1898, the relator claims that on March 11th, 1898, he was in rightful possession of the office ■of clerk of the city of Camden, and that on that day the defendant forcibly ejected him from said office and usurped the functions of the same. The information alleges that in accordance with the act of May 8th, 1894 (Gen. Stat., p. 581), the relator was on May 11th, 1894, elected by the city council to the office of city clerk for the term of two years, and was-again in May, 1896,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wanser v. HoosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Owens v. FurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State ex rel. McCarthy v. QueenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API