Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McCarthy v. Queen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On quo warranto on demurrer to information.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

These cases come before the court upon informations in the nature of quo warranto, one instituted by a police justice of Jersey City, appointed under an act passed May 18th, 1894 {Pamph. L., p. 451), for a term not to expire until January 1st, 1910, and the other by the city collector of Jersey City, appointed under an act approved March 19th, 1891 {Pmvph. L., p. 198), for a term not to expire until January 1st, 1909.

The defendants were appointed to succeed the relators by virtue of an act entitled “An act concerning the government of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re ClevelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  2. Wanser v. HoosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Owens v. FurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Oler v. RidgewaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  5. State ex rel. Matheson v. CaminadeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Township of Mahwah v. Bergen County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Beirne v. GangemiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Livelli v. Mayor of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API