Arata v. Tellerium Gold & Silver Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Amador. The suit was to foreclose certain mechanic’s liens upon a quartz mining claim. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
1. Appellants make the point that the court erred in overruling the demurrer of defendants to the separate complaint of E. A. Ketchum.
Our attention has not been called specially to any defects in the complaint. We can discover no insufficiencies in it such as rendered it subject to general demurrer.
2. It is said the court below erred in admitting the “ claims of lien” of plaintiffs. The statute (§ 1187, Code Civ. Proc.), requires a claim to contain a “statement of his demand .... with the name of the owner or reputed owner, if known, and also the name of the person by whom he was…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Lorenz v. Commercial Acceptance InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Reed v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Oppenheimer v. DeutchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Minor v. MarshallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.